Disclosure following a medical error: lessons learned from a national initiative of workshops with patients, healthcare teams, and executives.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increase in disclosures of medical errors, transparency remains a challenge. Recognized barriers include shame, fear of litigation, disciplinary actions, and loss of patient trust. In 2018, the Israeli Ministry of Health initiated a series of workshops about disclosure of medical errors. The workshops involved medical center executives, healthcare providers, patients, and family members of patients who had previously been harmed by a medical error. This study presents the lessons learned about perceived challenges in disclosure of errors in 15 such workshops. METHODS: Data collection included participant observations in 15 workshops, full audio recordings of all of the workshops, and documentation of detailed field notes. Analysis was performed under thematic analysis guidelines. RESULTS: We identified four main themes: "Providers agree on the value of disclosure of a medical error to the patient"; "Emotional challenges of disclosure of medical error to patients"; "The medico-legal discourse challenges transparency"; and "Providers and patients call for a change in the culture regarding disclosure of medical errors". Participant observations indicated that the presence of a patient who had experienced a tragedy in another hospital, and who was willing to share it created an intimate atmosphere that enabled an open conversation between parties. CONCLUSION: The study shows the moral, human, and educational values of open discourse in a protective setting after the occurrence of a medical error. We believe that workshops like these may help foster a culture of institutional disclosure following medical errors. We recommend that the Ministry of Health extend such workshops to all healthcare facilities, establish guidelines and mandate training for skills in disclosure for all providers.

[CASE REPORT: LEGAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL ASPECTS OF THE DYING PATIENT ACT].

INTRODUCTION: We present a patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), dependent on noninvasive ventilation, whose advance directives precluded life-prolonging measures. The patient was found in cardiac arrest and in accordance with the directives of her surrogate decision maker, underwent intubation and mechanical ventilation. Later, an additional surrogate decision maker disapproved of ventilation and when the ventilator was disconnected for bronchial suctioning, she asked the nurse not to reconnect the patient to the ventilator. We discuss the legal, psychological and ethical aspects of implementation of Israeli law in this complex patient.

Meaningful shared decision-making: complex process demanding cognitive and emotional skills.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) takes place when clinicians help patient identify best course of action in the context of their preferences. METHODS: The aim of this paper is a narrative review of the literature with special focus on the humanistic dimensions of SDM. RESULTS: We show that SDM is largely underused in practice, because of many barriers such as time constraints and poor skills. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that listening and empathy are key challenges in communicating uncertainty, which require emotional intelligence and trust building skills. To promote implementation, we propose the development of tools, simulation-based training and the design of improved measures for SDM quality. While essential for patients, we believe that SDM may restore meaning in healthcare.

Does Physician's Training Induce Overconfidence That Hampers Disclosing Errors?

PURPOSE: Although transparency is critical for reducing medical errors, physicians feel discomfort with disclosure. We explored whether overconfidence relates to physician's reluctance to admit that an error may have occurred. METHOD: At 3 university medical centers, a survey presented a clinical vignette of a girl with urinary infection and penicillin allergy to medical students and physicians, asking them to rate their level of confidence for each step of the diagnosis and management. After anaphylaxis develops after cephalosporin administration, respondents were asked about their willingness to admit that an error might have occurred and to rate their level of discomfort in doing so. We analyzed levels of confidence, accuracy, willingness to admit mistake, and discomfort. RESULTS: Respondents reported high levels of confidence for their answers to the questions of diagnosis and management, even when wrong-indicating miscalibration of confidence and accuracy. Compared with students, physicians had significantly higher levels of confidence, lower accuracy, and lower willingness to admit mistake. Although most respondents agreed in principle that errors should be disclosed, in the presented case, significantly less agreed to admit that a mistake might have occurred or to say so explicitly to the family. An association was found between overconfidence and discomfort with disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows overconfidence associated with clinician's training and with reluctance to admit mistake, suggesting a contributing role to the difficulty in leveraging safety events into quality improvement. Training physicians to have both knowledge and adequate self-doubt is an educational challenge.

What can we learn from simulation-based training to improve skills for end-of-life care? Insights from a national project in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training improves residents' skills for end-of-life (EOL) care. In the field, staff providers play a significant role in handling those situations and in shaping practice by role modeling. We initiated an educational intervention to train healthcare providers for improved communication skills at EOL using simulation of sensitive encounters with patients and families. METHODS: Hospital physicians and nurses (n = 1324) attended simulation-based workshops (n = 100) in a national project to improve EOL care. We analyzed perceptions emerging from group discussions following simulations, from questionnaires before and after each workshop, and from video-recorded simulations using a validated coding system. We used the simulation setting as a novel tool for action research. We used a participatory inquiry paradigm, with repetitive cycles of exploring barriers and challenges with participants in an iterative pattern of observation, discussion and reflection - including a description of our own responses and evolution of thought as well as system effects. RESULTS: The themes transpiring included lack of training, knowledge and time, technology overuse, uncertainty in decision-making, poor skills for communication and teamwork. Specific scenarios demonstrated lack of experience at eliciting preferences for EOL care and at handling conflicts or dilemmas. Content analysis of simulations showed predominance of cognitive utterances - by an order of magnitude more prevalent than emotional expressions. Providers talked more than actors did and episodes of silence were rare. Workshop participants acknowledged needs to improve listening skills, attention to affect and teamwork. They felt that the simulation-based workshop is likely to ameliorate future handling of EOL situations. We observed unanticipated consequences from our project manifested as a field study of preparedness to EOL in nursing homes, followed by a national survey on quality of care, leading to expansion of palliative care services and demand for EOL care education in various frameworks and professional areas. CONCLUSIONS: Reflective simulation exercises show barriers and paths to improvement among staff providers. When facing EOL situations, physicians and nurses use cognitive language far more often than emotions related expressions, active listening, or presence in silence. Training a critical mass of staff providers may be valuable to induce a cultural shift in EOL care.

Medical students as health coaches: Implementation of a student-initiated Lifestyle Medicine curriculum.

BACKGROUND: By 2020, the World Health Organization predicts that two-thirds of all diseases worldwide will be the result of lifestyle choices. Physicians often do not counsel patients about healthy behaviors, and lack of training has been identified as one of the barriers. Between 2010 and 2014, Hebrew University developed and implemented a 58-h Lifestyle Medicine curriculum spanning five of the 6 years of medical school. Content includes nutrition, exercise, smoking cessation, and behavior change, as well as health coaching practice with friends/relatives (preclinical years) and patients (clinical years). This report describes this development and diffusion process, and it also presents findings related to the level of acceptance of this student-initiated Lifestyle Medicine (LM) curriculum. METHODS: Students completed an online semi-structured questionnaire after the first coaching session (coaching questionnaire) and the last coaching session (follow-up questionnaire). RESULTS: Nine hundred and twenty-three students completed the coaching questionnaire (296 practices were with patients, 627 with friends /relatives); and 784 students completed the follow-up questionnaire (208 practices were with patients, 576 with friends /relatives). They reported overall that health coaching domains included smoking cessation (263 students), nutrition (79), and exercise (117); 464 students reported on combined topics. Students consistently described a high acceptance of the curriculum and their active role in coaching. Further, most students reported that they were eager to address their own health behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: We described the development and acceptance of a student-initiated comprehensive LM curriculum. Students perceived LM as an important component of physicians' professional role and were ready to explore it both as coaches and in their personal lives. Thus, medical school deans might consider developing similar initiatives in order to position medical schools as key players within a preventive strategy in healthcare policy.

Patient Self-Assessment of Surgical Site Infection is Inaccurate.

BACKGROUND: Availability of surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance rates challenges clinicians, healthcare administrators and leaders and the public. The purpose of this report is to demonstrate the consequences patient self-assessment strategies have on SSI reporting rates. METHODS: We performed SSI surveillance among patients undergoing general surgery procedures, including telephone follow-up 30 days after surgery. Additionally we undertook a separate validation study in which we compared patient self-assessments of SSI with surgeon assessment. Finally, we performed a meta-analysis of similar validation studies of patient self-assessment strategies. RESULTS: There were 22/266 in-hospital SSIs diagnosed (8.3%), and additional 16 cases were detected through the 30-day follow-up. In total, the SSI rate was 16.8% (95% CI 10.1-18.5). In the validation survey, we found patient telephone surveillance to have a sensitivity of 66% (95% CI 40-93%) and a specificity of 90% (95% CI 86-94%). The meta-analysis included five additional studies. The overall sensitivity was 83.3% (95% CI 79-88%), and the overall specificity was 97.4% (95% CI 97-98%). Simulation of the meta-analysis results divulged that when the true infection rate is 1%, reported rates would be 4%; a true rate of 50%, the reported rates would be 43%. CONCLUSION: Patient self-assessment strategies in order to fulfill 30-day SSI surveillance misestimate SSI rates and lead to an erroneous overall appreciation of inter-institutional variation. Self-assessment strategies overestimate SSIs rate of institutions with high-quality performance and underestimate rates of poor performance. We propose such strategies be abandoned. Alternative strategies of patient follow-up strategies should be evaluated in order to provide valid and reliable information regarding institutional performance in preventing patient harm.

Physician-facilitated designation of proxy decision-makers: family physician perceptions.

BACKGROUND: Among the challenges encountered during the care of patients at the end-of-life (EOL), eliciting preferences of patients with whom there is no ability to communicate is common and stressful for all those concerned and charged with patient care. Legal facilities available include patient delegation of proxy decision-makers (PDM) prior to communication incapacity. We sought to estimate family physician awareness and attitude with regard to these aspects of patient care. METHODS: A telephone survey of family physicians in the Jerusalem, Israel, district using a standard questionnaire. RESULTS: 74 family physicians responded to the survey. The response rate was 42 % and the cooperation rate was 66 %. Most of the respondents, (64 %), reported knowing that the PDM delegation facility exists, though only 24 % claimed to have suggested to their patients that they consider this option. Approximately three-quarters, (78 %), treat patients with whom they discussed other aspects of severe disease, disability or EOL. None of the physicians working predominantly with religiously observant groups reported suggesting PDM delegation. CONCLUSIONS: There is an apparent gap between family physician knowledge and their performance to empower the persistence of patient autonomy, should communication ability cease. System-wide interventions to increase EOL communication skills, starting at medical school and henceforth, are necessary in order to promote better EOL care and meaningful resource use.

Effects of Social Network Exposure on Nutritional Learning: Development of an Online Educational Platform.

BACKGROUND: Social networking sites (SNSs) such as Facebook have the potential to enhance online public health interventions, in part, as they provide social exposure and reinforcement. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate whether social exposure provided by SNSs enhances the effects of online public health interventions. METHODS: As a sample intervention, we developed Food Hero, an online platform for nutritional education in which players feed a virtual character according to their own nutritional needs and complete a set of virtual sport challenges. The platform was developed in 2 versions: a "private version" in which a user can see only his or her own score, and a "social version" in which a user can see other players' scores, including preexisting Facebook friends. We assessed changes in participants' nutritional knowledge using 4 quiz scores and 3 menu-assembly scores. Monitoring feeding and exercising attempts assessed engagement with the platform. RESULTS: The 2 versions of the platform were randomly assigned between a study group (30 members receiving the social version) and a control group (33 members, private version). The study group's performance on the quizzes gradually increased over time, relative to that of the control group, becoming significantly higher by the fourth quiz (P=.02). Furthermore, the study group's menu-assembly scores improved over time compared to the first score, whereas the control group's performance deteriorated. Study group members spent an average of 3:40 minutes assembling each menu compared to 2:50 minutes in the control group, and performed an average of 1.58 daily sport challenges, compared to 1.21 in the control group (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: This work focused on isolating the SNSs' social effects in order to help guide future online interventions. Our results indicate that the social exposure provided by SNSs is associated with increased engagement and learning in an online nutritional educational platform.

Preparedness for End of Life-a Survey of Jerusalem District Nursing Homes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care in nursing homes. DESIGN: Survey and semistructured interviews. SETTING: Jerusalem district nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Staff members of 28 long-term care and skilled nursing facilities in the Jerusalem area in Israel of various ethnic, religious, and administrative affiliations (N = 207). MEASUREMENTS: Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews and statistical analysis of questionnaires. RESULTS: Most staff members reported that EOL preferences were unknown for more than 90% of residents and that fewer than 10% had a healthcare proxy. Most staff members recalled conducting fewer than five EOL conversations over the past year with residents or family members and could recall fewer than five cases in which a resident was allowed to die in the nursing home. According to staff opinions the prevalence of tube feeding was estimated at greater than 10%, initiated because of aspiration, malnutrition, and understaffing, often against family's preferences. More than 25% of staff members believed that pain management was inadequate. Knowledge about management of chronic pain was poor in half of nurses and nearly one-third of physicians. Most staff would rather not receive the treatments they administered to residents. CONCLUSION: Nursing homes in Jerusalem lack competency for quality EOL care, and there are multiple psychological, training, and policy challenges to improvement.

Quality and extent of informed consent for invasive procedures: a pilot study at the institutional level in Turkey.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of informed consent for patients undergoing invasive procedures and to reveal patient preferences for being informed about the potential risks of treatment and alternatives to treatment. DESIGN: This study was planned as a pilot study. Hospitalized patients' perceptions and expectations about the informed-consent process were explored in a general surgery department. The prepared questionnaire was completed by patients via interview. SETTING: Inpatient services of the general surgery department of a large academic hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. PARTICIPANTS: The study population consisted of hospitalized patients in a general surgery department who underwent invasive procedures in March 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recognition of consent forms by the patients, rate of patients' recall of risks, rate of patients who were willing to be involved in decision making, and rate of patients who were satisfied with the whole decision-making process were measured. RESULTS: All patients signed consent forms. Most patients did not properly read the consent form since they trusted their physician. Potential exposure to risk seemed to be important for patient expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Paternalism seemed to dominate our clinical setting. The informed-consent process was definitely a separate issue from signing the consent forms. We conclude that the informed-consent process should be modified to be more functional and appropriate to human psychology. We suggest that education is necessary for informed consent to promote better quality and safety in health care.

Improving compliance to osteoporosis workup and treatment in postmenopausal patients after a distal radius fracture.

OBJECTIVE: Distal radius fracture (DRF) in postmenopausal women is often the first clinical sign of osteoporosis (OP). Despite the availability of effective treatments, only a minority of patients who sustain a fragility fracture are tested for OP. The purpose of this study was to examine whether a simple intervention by the hospital staff increases rates of OP workup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ninety nine patients after DRF were randomized to two groups. Both groups were contacted after their fracture and were asked to answer a questionnaire and were informed about the possible relationship between DRF and OP. In the intervention group, patients were sent an explanatory pamphlet and a letter to their primary care physician. An additional survey was conducted to establish whether the intervention improved the number of patients who undergo OP workup. RESULTS: The intervention increased the proportion of patients who turned to their primary care physician from 22.9% to 68.6%, and increased the proportion of patients undergoing OP workup from 14.3% to 40% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Women with DRF who receive an explanation about possible OP implications and are sent explanatory materials are more likely to undergo OP workup.

Unexplained complaints in primary care: evidence of action bias.

PURPOSE: Primary care physicians sometimes encounter patients with clinical complaints that do not fit into a recognized diagnostic pattern. This study was undertaken to assess the way physicians respond to patients whose symptoms are unusual or unexplained that is, what approach they take in the absence of a working hypothesis. METHODS: We surveyed 130 primary care physicians affiliated with 3 academic centers in Israel, presenting 5 clinical vignettes describing patients who had unusual complaints, no clear diagnosis, and no apparent need for urgent care. We asked physicians to provide the most likely diagnosis for each case and to rate their level of confidence in that diagnosis;respondents were also asked to provide a management strategy for each case and their level of confidence in the chosen approach. Finally, we asked the physicians to estimate how many of their own patients have presentations similar to the individuals in the clinical vignettes. RESULTS: Physicians proposed, on average, 22 diagnoses for each case. Most indicated that they would choose action (testing, consulting, sending the patient to the emergency department, or prescribing) rather than follow-up only (87% vs 13%; P<.01). Respondents' confidence in the management approach they had chosen for all the cases was higher than their confidence in the diagnoses (5.6 vs 4.3, respectively, on a scale of1-10; P<.001). Physicians estimated that 10% to 20% of the patients they see in their practice have unusual or unexplained symptoms that are difficult to diagnose. CONCLUSION: Uncertain diagnosis is a regular challenge for primary care physicians. In such cases, we found that physicians prefer a workup to follow-up, an inclination consistent with"action bias."

Vaccination, herd behavior, and herd immunity.

BACKGROUND: During the 2009 outbreak of novel influenza AH1N1, insufficient data were available to adequately inform decision makers about benefits and risks of vaccination and disease. We hypothesized that individuals would opt to mimic their peers, having no better decision anchor. We used Game Theory, decision analysis, and transmission models to simulate the impact of subjective risks and preference estimates on vaccination behavior. METHODS: We asked 95 students to provide estimates of risk and health state valuations with regard to AH1N1 infection, complications, and expectations of vaccine benefits and risks. These estimates were included in a sequential chain of models: a dynamic epidemic model, a decision tree, and a population-level model. Additionally, participants' intentions to vaccinate or not at varying vaccination rates were documented. RESULTS: The model showed that at low vaccination rates, vaccination dominated. When vaccination rates increased above 78%, nonvaccination was the dominant strategy. We found that vaccination intentions did not correspond to the shift in strategy dominance and segregated to 3 types of intentions: regardless of what others do 29/95 (31%) intended to vaccinate while 27/95 (28%) did not; among 39 of 95 (41%) intention was positively associated with putative vaccination rates. CONCLUSIONS: Some people conform to the majority's choice, either shifting epidemic dynamics toward herd immunity or, conversely, limiting societal goals. Policy leaders should use models carefully, noting their limitations and theoretical assumptions. Behavior drivers were not explicitly explored in this study, and the discrepant results beg further investigation. Models including real subjective perceptions with empiric or subjective probabilities can provide insight into deviations from expected rational behavior and suggest interventions in order to provide better population outcomes.

[The effect of an intervention on rates of central vascular catheter-related bloodstream infection in intensive care units at the Hadassah Medical Center].

INTRODUCTION: Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) is a significant source for morbidity and mortality in addition to increased hospital costs. Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) have a greater risk for CR-BSI. Continuous monitoring and control of intravascular central catheters insertion (CCI) by using checklists have a key role in reducing the rate of infections and improving patient health care quality and safety. OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of CR-BSI, and to evaluate the adherence of ICU teams to infection control guidelines during CCI prior to and following an intervention program in ICU patients. METHODS: The present study was conducted in six ICUs at the Hadassah Medical Center, during a period of 15 months. The rate of CR-BSI was determined in 320 patients with central catheters during the first period of the study. Assessment of adherence to infection control guidelines during CCI was carried out by observations. Educational intervention consisted of the introduction of physician guidelines for CCI, implementing a checklist to ensure adherence to the guidelines and lectures for the teams, beginning in the second period of the study. During the third period of the study, the rate of CR-BSI was determined in 336 patients with central catheters in the same ICUs, by the same research methods. RESULTS: Following the intervention, a significant reduction in the rate of CR-BSI was observed in the study population from 9.66 to 3.63 infections per 1000 catheter days, with 62.4% risk reduction for CR-BSI, (P < 0.001). Improvements were also recorded in the CCI process and the rate of compliance of the ICUs team with infection control guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a simple and inexpensive intervention reduced the rate of CR-BSI, leading to improved process of insertion of these catheters. DISCUSSION: The continuous monitoring of the rate of CR-BSI and using checklists in every CCI process may reduce the morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, and lower hospital costs associated with centrally placed vascular catheters.

A simple intervention for improving the implementation rate of a recommended osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis is often under-treated, and hip fracture is frequently its first manifestation. Hospitalization for a hip fracture is an opportunity to initiate osteoporosis treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a simple intervention improves the implementation rate of a recommended osteoporosis treatment. METHODS: One hundred elderly patients admitted with low-impact hip fracture were given a 10 minute explanation about osteoporosis and its treatment during their postoperative hospital stay. In addition, the patients received an explanatory brochure and a letter to their primary care physician that included an article on fracture rate reduction with osteoporosis treatment. Implementation of therapy was assessed by a telephone survey 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The patients who had not received treatment at 3 months were given a repeated explanation. The historical control group was comprised of 100 hip fracture patients with similar demographic characteristics, who were operated on and discharged with the standard care recommendations for osteoporosis prevention. RESULTS: At the 3 month follow-up, the therapy rate in both groups was similar (19%). Fifty-eight percent of the patients in the study group had no recollection of the intervention. However, after a repeated explanation, at the 6 month follow-up, 39% of the intervention group had received drug therapy for fracture prevention (P<.001). CONCLUSION: A simple intervention enlisting the patients' help to involve their primary care physician can increase treatment rates for osteoporosis following a hip fracture. During the immediate postoperative period, the patients and their families have difficulty implementing the recommendations. Therefore, repeated communications are recommended.

Shared decision-making in Israel: status, barriers, and recommendations.

Shared decision making (SDM) - involving patients in decisions relevant to their health - has been increasingly influential in medical thought and practice around the world. This paper reviews the current status of SDM in Israel, including efforts to promote SDM in the legislation and healthcare system, its influence in medical training and the national health plans, and funding for SDM-related research. Published studies of SDM in Israel are also reviewed. Although informed consent and patients' right to information are regulated by Israeli law, little provision is made for SDM. Further, there are few organized programs to promote SDM among medical professionals or the public, and governmental support of SDM-related research is minimal. Nonetheless, patients have begun to influence litigation in both formal and informal capacities, medical schools have begun to incorporate courses for improving physician-patient communication into their curricula, and the largest national health plan has initiated a plan to increase public awareness. A review of the limited research literature suggests that although patients and physicians express a desire for greater patient involvement, they often have reservations about its implementation. Research also suggests that despite the positive effects of SDM, such an approach may only infrequently be applied in actual clinical practice. In conclusion, though not actively promoting SDM at present, Israel's universal coverage and small number of health plans make rapid, widespread advances in SDM feasible. Israeli policymakers should thus be encouraged to nurture burgeoning initiatives and set plausible milestones. Comparing the status of SDM in Israel with that in other countries may stimulate further advancement.

[Challenges and barriers in the promotion of quality in health care services].

The promotion of quality and safety in health care faces many challenges and barriers including lack of cooperation by physicians. Complexity and uncertainty in measuring quality raise methodological difficulties. Lack of sufficient awareness about these limitations, also among those who measure quality, contributes to physicians lack of interest, suspicion and mistrust. Strategic issues associated with quality assessment in the Israeli health care system derive from lack of regulation and evasiveness about the accountability of executives and governing bodies regarding the quality of the services provided to patients in hospitals and clinics. Some of these challenges relate to the intrusion of market forces into the world of medicine without needed adaptations, so that reimbursement is often conveniently linked to the quantity of services and not to their quality. Efficiency, which characterizes competitive markets, is not easily translated in the clinical world where empathy, listening skills, and capability of explaining are critical physician attributes. This clinical world values giving beyond monetary compensation, and cooperation between institutions--rather than competition--all crucial for the continuity of patient's care. The interface between economics and health care calls for creative thinking, with a novel definition for the social value of medical and nursing care according to their quality and not their quantity.

The status of shared decision making and citizen participation in Israeli medicine.

WHAT ABOUT POLICY REGARDING SDM? Though informed consent and patients' right to information are regulated by Israeli law, there is a low level of formal activities focused on shared decision making (SDM) in Israel. Further, there are few organized programs to promote SDM among medical professionals or the public, and governmental support of SDM-related research is minimal. WHAT ABOUT TOOLS - DECISION SUPPORT FOR PATIENTS? The Israeli government does not have a program on development of patient decision aids. WHAT ABOUT PROFESSIONAL INTEREST AND IMPLEMENTATION? Nonetheless, patients have begun to influence litigation in both formal and informal capacities, medical schools have begun to incorporate courses for improving physician-patient communication into their curricula, and the largest national health plan has initiated a plan to increase pubic awareness. Funding for researching and promoting SDM is not centrally allocated, and studies show that despite the positive effects of SDM, such an approach is infrequently applied in actual clinical practice, and initiatives to promote SDM (e.g., decision aids) are in their infancy. WHAT DOES THE FUTURE LOOK LIKE? In conclusion, though not actively promoting SDM at present, Israel, with its governmentally regulated universal coverage with good access to high-level services possesses all the requisite elements for rapid, widespread advances in SDM in future years.